lacunary - Mathnotes

Algebraic Properties

Complex Numbers - Basics

A pure imaginary number is the product of a real number and a number i which is defined by the relation i2=1.

Note that the complex numbers include both the real numbers and the imaginary numbers.

The a in the complex number z=a+bi is called the real part of z; the b is called the imaginary part of z.

Note that the imaginary part of a complex number is itself real.

If z=a+bi, then the conjugate of z, written as z¯, is z¯=abi.

To form the conjugate of a complex number, simply change the sign of the coefficient of i.

If z=a+bi, then the absolute value of z or modulus of z, written as |z|, is |z|=a2+b2.

In a rectangular coordinate system, we can label the x-axis as the real axis and the y-axis as the imaginary axis, allowing us to represent any complex number z=a+bi graphically by plotting a along the real (x) axis and b along the imaginary (y) axis:

Complex Plane

This also helps establish relationships between a complex numbe rand the polar coordinates of its point. In the following figure, we have represented graphically the complex number z=x+iy and the polar coordinate (r,θ) of its point:

Complex Polar and Rectangular Coordinates

This image makes the following relationships obvious:

|z|=r=x2+y2

x=rcosθ

y=rsinθ

If we take

z=x+yi

and call it the rectangular form of z, we can replace x and y with their polar equivalents to get:

z=rcosθ+irsinθ=r(cosθ+isinθ)

which is called the polar form of z.

The polar angle θ in the figure above is called the principal argument of z, written as Argz, and is defined to be an angle in (π,π] satisfying the two equalities:

cosθ=x|z|,sinθ=y|z|

or

tanθ=yx,

as long as x is non-zero.

We can use Arctanyx to find the principal argument; if z is in the first or fourth quadrants, it gives it directly. If z is in the second quadrant, we must add π to Arctanyx, and if z is in the third quadrant we must subtract π from Arctanyx.

Writing it as argz means that instead of taking the principal value of θ, we have a multivalued function giving all possible angles satisfying those two equalities:

argz=Argz±2nπ, n=1,2,3

Sometimes, argz is taken to mean any argument of z, so that it's still single valued.

When z=0, no argument exists.

When z=x+yi and x=0, the complex number lies on the imaginary axis and is either π2 or π2.

We can also write a complex number in exponential form, by taking advantage of Euler's formula:

eθi=cosθ+isinθ.

This means we can write a complex number z with r=z,θ=argz as

z=r(cosθ+isinθ)=reθi.

This form makes it super obvious that arguments add and moduli multiply when multiplying complex numbers:

aeθi+beϕi=abe(θ+ϕ)i

Algebra of Complex Numbers

Here are the rules for performing addition, subtraction, multiplication and division with complex numbers. They follow the normal rules of algebra, with the number i2 being replaced by its agreed upon value 1. If z1=a+bi and z2=c+di are two complex numbers, then by definition:

z1+z2=(a+bi)+(c+di)=(a+c)+(b+d)i(18.6)

z1z2=(a+bi)(c+di)=(ac)+(bd)i(18.61)

z1z2=(a+bi)(c+di)=ac+adi+bci+bdi2=(acbd)+(ad+bc)i(18.62)

z1z2=a+bic+dicdicdi=(ac+bd)+(bcad)ic2+d2=ac+bdc2+d2+bcadc2+d2i,c2+d20(18.63)

We get some nice behavior when multiplying complex numbers in polar form due to the following property:

arg(z1z2)=arg(z1)+arg(z2)

That is, when we multiply numbers complex numbers, we can add their arguments (and multiply their moduli):

z1z2=r1r2(cos(θ1+θ2)+isin(θ1+θ2))

This can be interpreted geometrically that multiplying by a complex number causes rotation in the complex plane.

Note that when we take the conjugate of a number z=reiθ we get z=riθ. This is a number with the same magnitude as z but with the opposite angle. On the unit circle, where all numbers have the same magnitude, we have zz=1 because multiplying z by its conjugate rotates it exactly how much it was rotated, but in the opposite direction.

We can use this property to easily compute powers of complex numbers, which is sometimes called DeMoivre's theorem:

Theorem: de Moivre's Theorem \@{de-moivres-}

zn=rn(cosnθ+isinnθ)

Theorem: nth root of z \@{nth-root-of-z}

For complex z and integer n, with z=r(cosx+isinx), we have

r1n(cosx+2πkn+isinx+2πkn).

Square Root of Complex Numbers

To find the square roots z of a complex number Z is to solve the following equation for z:

Z=z2.

If X and Y are the real and imaginary parts of Z and we let x and y be the real and imaginary parts of z, then we have:

X+Yi=(x+yi)=x2+2xyiy2,

from which we can form two equations by equating real and imaginary parts from both sides:

X=x2y2,Y=2xy

Now we have two equations and two unknowns, and when they are solved, we will have the two square roots of Z.

By definition, the principal square root of Z is the square root with the non-negative real part.

Complex Quadratics

We can use the quadratic formula to solve quadratics in a complex variable with complex coefficients, that is where

az2+bz+c=0,

where a, b, c, and z, are complex; it may require taking the square root of a complex number.

Exponential, Trigonometric and Hyperbolic Functions of Complex Numbers

Some Maclaurin series expansions for a complex valued z:

ez=1+z1!+z22!+z33!+(18.73)

sinz=zz33!+z55!+(18.74)

cosz=1z22!+z44!+(18.75)

Interestingly, cosi turns out to be a real number:

cosz=1+12!+14!+16!

Using the series expansions above, we can prove the following identities which we will use in this chapter (see the book for proof outlines, full proofs are beyond the scope of the book):

e0=1(18.8)

ez1ez2=ez1+z2(18.81)

eiz=cosz+isinz(18.82)

eiz=coszisinz(18.83)

sinz=12i(eizeiz)(18.84)

cosz=12(eiz+eiz)(18.85)

ez0 for any value of z(18.86)

The hyperbolic functions are defined as:

sinhz=ezez2(18.9)

coshz=ez+ez2(18.91)

tanhz=sinhzcoshz=ezezez+ez(18.92)

and are called, respectively, the hyperbolic sine, hyperbolic cosine, and hyperbolic tangent of z.

Proof that imaginary roots of polynomials with real coefficients occur in pairs

(jmh my notes, the answers to exercises 18.6 through 18.9.)

First a couple of facts about adding and multiplying conjugates. Assume z1=a+bi and z2=c+di.

Then:

z¯1+z¯2=(abi)+(cdi)=(a+c)(b+d)i=(a+c)+(b+d)i=(a+bi)+(c+di)=z1+z2(z.1)

and

z1z2=(a+bi)(c+di)=(acbd)+(ad+bc)i=(acbd)(ad+bc)i=acbdadibci=acbcibdadi=c(abi)di(abi)=(abi)(cdi)=z¯1z¯2(z.2)

Now the main proof follows. Given that r is a root of

anxn+an1xn1++a1x+a0=0(a)

i.e. that the following statement is true:

anrn+an1rn1++a1r+a0=0(b)

and that an, an1, ..., a0 are real numbers, we will show that r¯ is also a root of (a), that is, that:

anr¯n+an1r¯n1++a1r¯+a0=0(c)

Going back to (b) we can take the conjugate of both sides to get:

anrn+an1rn1++a1r+a0=0¯=0(d)

Using (z.1), we can rewrite (d) as:

anrn+an1rn1++a1r+a0=0(e)

Using (z.2), we can rewrite (e) as:

anrn+an1rn1++a1r+a0=0(f)

Again using (z.2) and the fact that rn=rrr.... repeated n times, we can rewrite (f) as:

a¯nr¯n+a¯n1r¯n1++a¯1r¯+a¯0=0(g)

Note that since an, an1 are real numbers, they are complex numbers of the form an+0i, an1+0i,..., and since an+0i=an0i we have:

an=a¯n,an1=a¯n1,...(g)

And therefore we can rewrite (g) as:

anr¯n+an1r¯n1++a1r¯+a0=0(h)

Which is the statement we wished to prove (c).