lacunary - Mathnotes

Note \@{connected-sets-reference-note}

This section was developed by following Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, Chapter 2.

Connected Sets

We have a different - less general, but compatible - definition of connected from complex analysis:

Definition: Connected Complex \@{connected-complex}

A set S is said to be connected if every pair of points in S can be joined by a finite number of line segments joined end to end that lie entirely within S.

Referenced by (1 direct)

Direct references:

This theorem helps connect the two definitions.

Theorem \@{connected-sets-in-r1-are-intervals}

A subset E of the real line R1 is connected if and only if it has the following property: If xE,yE, and x<z<y, then zE.

Proof \@{proof-of-connected-sets-in-r1-are-intervals}

We will proceed both sides of the implication by proving the contrapositive, i.e., that if the interval property doesn't hold, then the set isn't connected, and conversely, that if the set isn't connected, the interval property doesn't hold.

Suppose x,yE and z(x,y),zE. Then E=AzBz, where

Az=E(,z),Bz=E(z,).

Since xAz and yBz, they are nonempty, and since Az(,z) and Bz(z,), they are separated. Therefore, E is not connected.

Conversely, suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that E is not connected. Then there are nonempty separated sets A an B such that AB=E. Let xA,yB and assume x<y. Define

z=sup(A[x,y]).

By Let E be a nonempty set of..., zA, and because A and B are separated, zB. Therefore xz<y.

If zA, it follows that x<z<y, and zE.

If zA, then zB, hence there exists z1 such that z<z1<y and z1B (because zB means there is a neighborhood of z that contains no points of B.) Thus, x<z1<y and z1E.