lacunary - Mathnotes

Definition: Formal System \@{formal-system}

A formal system F is an ordered quadruple

F=(Σ,W,A,R)

where:

  1. Σ is a finite, nonempty alphabet (a set of symbols);
  2. W⊆Σ∗ is the set of well-formed-formulas (wffs), defined inductively by formation rules specifying which finite strings over Σ belong to W
  3. A⊆W is a distinguished subset of W, whose members are called axioms.
  4. R is a finite set of rules of inference, each of which is a relation on W determining from which formulas other formulas may be derived.
Referenced by (1 direct)

Direct references:

Definition: Derivation (also: proof) \@{derivation}

A derivation (or proof) in F is a finite sequence of formulas

φ1,φ2,…,φn

such that for each i≤n,

  1. Either φi∈A, or
  2. φi follows from earlier formulas in the sequence by an inference rule in R.
Referenced by (3 direct)

Direct references:

Definition: theorem \@{theorem}

A formula ψ∈W is a theorem (or provable formula) of F if there exists such a derivation ending with ψ. We then write

⊢Fψ.

Referenced by (1 direct)

Direct references:

Definition: recursive \@{recursive}

The system F is said to be recursive (or effectively generated) if W, A, and R are all @recursively-enumerable sets, so that derivations can be verified by a finite mechanical procedure.

Remark \@{remark-5}

No @semantics are assumed in this definition; a formal system is purely @syntactic.

A formal system operates purely on @form, not content.

Its symbols are inert marks; its rules manipulate these marks according to syntactic shape alone.

No step depends on what any symbol "means."

A proof in such a system is therefore a finite, mechanical transformation of strings; a sequence of moves in a symbol game governed entirely by explicit rules.

Semantics enter only afterward, when we interpret the symbols externally (e.g. as numbers, sets, or truth values).

Until then, the system is a syntax engine; a rule-bound procedure that generates certain strings (theorems) from others (axioms), without regard to interpretation or truth.

Note \@{note-6}

When an interpretation (model) M and a satisfaction relation ⊨M are supplied, one obtains a formal theory.